The group appointed a DPO as a part of its data protection office located at its headquarters, while its Luxembourg subsidiary only had a data protection lawyer that acted as a point of contact for the DPO; this structure precluded the DPO from being informed and consulted from the earliest stages of all data protection matters in Luxembourg, as the lawyer only communicated with the DPO when they deemed it necessary.
Related Posts
EU Introduces Stringent AI Legislation
The European Union has unveiled comprehensive legislation aimed at regulating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, with a strong focus…
CNIL Imposes €10 Million Fine – A Clear Call for Robust Cookie Consent Solutions
In a pivotal development for data privacy enforcement, France’s data protection authority, CNIL, has imposed a €10 million…
Irish National Police Data Leak Highlights Third-Party Risk
The recent data breach incident involving the Irish National Police. This breach underscores the critical importance of addressing…