A marketing intelligence company countersued a social network for blocking access to its network to prevent data scraping; however, it acknowledges that the social network’s terms of service prohibit the collection of data by automated means (the company self describes the automated nature of its product), the social network has a legitimate business purpose in preventing data scraping, and there is no injury to competition (the company’s competitors have access to the same content).
Related Posts
“Brazil’s ANPD Initiates Public Consultation: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Data Subject Rights in Focus for Data Privacy”
As a data privacy consultant, it’s encouraging to see the Brazilian Data Protection Authority (ANPD) taking proactive steps…
Breaking News for the iGaming Community: Strive Gaming Attains Certification and Provisional Gaming Supplier License in Michigan
Strive Gaming has secured both certification and a provisional gaming supplier license in Michigan, marking a significant milestone…
Turkey’s Entire Population Has Data Leaked
It was discovered that roughly 85 million people’s data (the entire population of Turkey) had their information added…