Employees filed a class action alleging the company collected their fingerprint data, but failed to provide a retention policy or privacy notice, and did not obtain their consent; the court rejected the company‘s argument that the policy requirement was merely a future obligation to destroy records, and confirmed that BIPA claims are not preempted by other laws on worker‘s compensation and federal airline deregulation.
Related Posts
Privacy Watchdog Ensures Sonobi Compliance with Digital Advertising Privacy Standards
In a significant development for the digital advertising landscape, a privacy watchdog has successfully brought Sonobi, a key…
Luxury Hotels Under Threat Following MGM Hack
Following the recent attack on MGM Resorts it seems cyber attackers are targeting luxury hospitality venues to steal log in information.
Zoom To Use User Content to Train AI
Zoom's recently updated terms and conditions allow for some concerning practices surrounding AI which has caused concern in the industry