California Court Permits Class Action Against Internet Company

The company’s privacy policy led consumers to believe that the “web and app activity” feature, when turned off, superseded tracking done by individual apps, and failed to define what “services” it was referring to with regards to tracking (users had no choice but to use other examples in the privacy policy); users sufficiently allege that the company intentionally intercepted communications to which they were a party without their consent, and that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy in their browsing habits.

#dataprivacy #value-privacy #CCPA

 

Total
0
Shares
Previous Post

Significant Risk Factors to Disclose to Investors

Next Post

Colorado Privacy Act passed by Colorado on June 7th

Related Posts
Total
0
Share
en_USEN